tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10318226.post57361535820805108..comments2023-05-12T04:28:33.800-05:00Comments on Antifluff Superstar Blog: Louisiana Senator Dan Claitor's SB 638 Advances Legislation to Provide Notice to Citizens re: Fluoridation DangersAntifluff Superstarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14223023283427976208noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10318226.post-37662773076193383352010-04-17T05:46:22.922-05:002010-04-17T05:46:22.922-05:00Water companies should have the "Certificate ...Water companies should have the "Certificate of Analysis" which shows where the fluoride chemicals come from. <br /><br />This one came from Frostburg, Maryland, and it shows the water fluoride chemicals contains 0.032% lead: http://www.scribd.com/doc/29108391/Chinese-Fluoride <br /><br />However, all fluoride chemicals - even those produced in the US - are allowed to contain trace amounts of lead, arsenic, mercury and other toxins by NSF International, the private company that regulates additives to our public water supplies. <br /><br />NSF International opened a branch in Shanghai China where Frostburg's fluoride chemicals originated from February 2008 NSF reported that 2% of the 245 fluoridation chemicals sampled from 2000 to 2006 had detectable levels of Lead, 43% contained arsenic. (There are approximately 155,000 US public water supplies.) <br /><br />Other allowable trace contaminants in fluoridation chemicals are antimony, barium, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, copper, mercury, selenium, and thallium. <br /><br />See: http://www.nsf.org/business/water_distribution/pdf/NSF_Fact_Sheet.pdfFluorideNewshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05767146308161608863noreply@blogger.com